Institution record
XM
XM Global Limited
- Source score
- 8.5
- Source exposures
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (cross-border payment institutions, msbs, remittance corridors, insurance and fiduciary trusts) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
| Regulator | Licence no. | Status | Licensed entity | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Australian Securities and Investments Commission | 000443670 | Regulated | TRADING.COM MARKETS PTY LTD | 2013-12-23 | |
Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission | 120/10 | Regulated | Trading Point of Financial Instruments Ltd | 2010-08-05 | |
Financial Sector Conduct Authority | 49976 | Regulated | XM ZA (PTY) LTD | 2019-09-13 | |
Financial Services Commission | 000261/397 | Offshore | XM Global Limited | — | |
Dubai Financial Services Authority | F003484 | Regulated | Trading Point MENA Limited | 2019-09-10 |
Peer source record comparison
Compare imported fields for XM and other records in our cross-border payment institutions, msbs, remittance corridors, insurance and fiduciary trusts dataset. These are not independent audit findings.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Source exposures |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XM (this record) | ASICCYSECFSCA+2 | 4 / 5 | Risk level not supplied | 8.5 | 0 |
South African Reserve Bank (SARB / Prudential Authority)FSCA | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 | |
South African Reserve Bank (SARB / Prudential Authority)FSCA | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 | |
FSCASouth African Reserve Bank (SARB / Prudential Authority) | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 | |
DFSA | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 | |
Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA)Prudential Regulation Authority (Bank of England PRA) | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 |
XM: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is XM's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
The imported dataset contains 5 licence entries associated with XM (legal entity reference: XM Global Limited); 4 are labelled "regulated" and 4 are labelled regulated or registered: ASIC (Australian Securities and Investments Commission) — licence 000443670, status: regulated; CYSEC (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission) — licence 120/10, status: regulated; FSCA (Financial Sector Conduct Authority) — licence 49976, status: regulated; Financial Services Commission — licence 000261/397, status: offshore; DFSA (Dubai Financial Services Authority) — licence F003484, status: regulated. These fields are not independent confirmation of current authorisation. Check the exact contracting entity and registration number on the official ASIC, CYSEC, FSCA public register.
Which of XM's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
No matching licence records were found in this site's cross-border payment institutions, msbs, remittance corridors, insurance and fiduciary trusts source selection. The dataset may be incomplete; check the relevant official registers before drawing conclusions about authorisation or jurisdiction.
What is XM's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
XM carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset, alongside composite 5-dimension ratings out of 10 (overall: 8.5, risk & licensing: 8.5, brand: 8.5, market influence: 8.5, user reputation: 0.0). The imported source lists 0 exposure entries. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to XM's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with XM (listed execution software: XM, MT4, MT5), institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (trading-point.com) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 source exposure entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to ASIC.