Institution record
INFINOX
- Source score
- 4.0
- Source exposures
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (cross-border payment institutions, msbs, remittance corridors, insurance and fiduciary trusts) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
| Regulator | Licence no. | Status | Licensed entity | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Securities Commission of The Bahamas | SIA F-188 | Regulated | IX Capital Group Limited | — | |
Financial Conduct Authority | 501057 | Suspected clone | Infinox Capital Limited | 2009-09-15 | |
Financial Services Commission, Mauritius | GB20025832 | Regulated | — | 2020-11-19 |
Peer source record comparison
Compare imported fields for INFINOX and other records in our cross-border payment institutions, msbs, remittance corridors, insurance and fiduciary trusts dataset. These are not independent audit findings.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Source exposures |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INFINOX (this record) | SCBFinancial Conduct AuthorityFinancial Services Commission, Mauritius | 2 / 3 | Risk level not supplied | 4.0 | 0 |
Financial Conduct AuthorityPrudential Regulation Authority (Bank of England PRA) | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 | |
Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA)Prudential Regulation Authority (Bank of England PRA) | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 | |
Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA)South African Reserve Bank (SARB / Prudential Authority) | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 | |
Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA) | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 | |
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S. Fed)+1 | 4 / 4 | Risk level not supplied | 4.0 | 0 |
INFINOX: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is INFINOX's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
The imported dataset contains 3 licence entries associated with INFINOX (legal entity reference: INFINOX); 2 are labelled "regulated" and 2 are labelled regulated or registered: SCB (Securities Commission of The Bahamas) — licence SIA F-188, status: regulated; Financial Conduct Authority — licence 501057, status: suspected clone; Financial Services Commission, Mauritius — licence GB20025832, status: regulated. These fields are not independent confirmation of current authorisation. Check the exact contracting entity and registration number on the official SCB, Financial Conduct Authority, Financial Services Commission, Mauritius public register.
Which of INFINOX's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
No matching licence records were found in this site's cross-border payment institutions, msbs, remittance corridors, insurance and fiduciary trusts source selection. The dataset may be incomplete; check the relevant official registers before drawing conclusions about authorisation or jurisdiction.
What is INFINOX's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
INFINOX carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset, alongside composite 5-dimension ratings out of 10 (overall: 4.0, risk & licensing: 4.0, brand: 4.0, market influence: 4.0, user reputation: 0.0). The imported source lists 0 exposure entries and 1 licence record with elevated status flags (Financial Conduct Authority: suspected clone). Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to INFINOX's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with INFINOX (listed execution software: IX SOCIAL, MT4, MT5), institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (infinox.co.uk/en) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 source exposure entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to SCB.