Institution record
Bitpanda Wallet
Bitpanda
- Source score
- 2.5
- Source exposures
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (cross-border payment institutions, msbs, remittance corridors, insurance and fiduciary trusts) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
| Regulator | Licence no. | Status | Licensed entity | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Municipal District Office of Vienna (Magistratisches Bezirksamt) | FN 511923 d | Regulated | Bitpanda Metals GmbH | 2020 | |
Austrian Financial Market Authority | FN 569240 v | Registered | Bitpanda GmbH | 2024 | |
Austrian Financial Market Authority | FN 551181 k | Regulated | Bitpanda Financial Services GmbH | 2024 | |
Austrian Financial Market Authority | FN 501412 x | Regulated | Bitpanda Payments GmbH | 2019 | |
Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht | HRB 258842 B | Regulated | Bitpanda Asset Management GmbH | 2024 | |
Financial Conduct Authority | 11625148 | Regulated | Bitpanda Custody Ltd | 2023 |
Peer source record comparison
Compare imported fields for Bitpanda Wallet and other records in our cross-border payment institutions, msbs, remittance corridors, insurance and fiduciary trusts dataset. These are not independent audit findings.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Source exposures |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bitpanda Wallet (this record) | Municipal District Office of Vienna (Magistratisches Bezirksamt)FMAFMA+3 | 5 / 6 | Risk level not supplied | 2.5 | 0 |
European Central Bank (ECB Banking Supervision / SSM)BaFinBoard of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S. Fed)+1 | 4 / 4 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 | |
De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB)BaFinEuropean Central Bank (ECB Banking Supervision / SSM) | 3 / 3 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 | |
BaFin | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 | |
Financial Conduct AuthorityPrudential Regulation Authority (Bank of England PRA) | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 | |
Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA)Prudential Regulation Authority (Bank of England PRA) | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 |
Bitpanda Wallet: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is Bitpanda Wallet's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
The imported dataset contains 6 licence entries associated with Bitpanda Wallet (legal entity reference: Bitpanda); 5 are labelled "regulated" and 6 are labelled regulated or registered: Municipal District Office of Vienna (Magistratisches Bezirksamt) — licence FN 511923 d, status: regulated; FMA (Austrian Financial Market Authority) — licence FN 569240 v, status: registered; FMA (Austrian Financial Market Authority) — licence FN 551181 k, status: regulated; FMA (Austrian Financial Market Authority) — licence FN 501412 x, status: regulated; BaFin (Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht) — licence HRB 258842 B, status: regulated; Financial Conduct Authority — licence 11625148, status: regulated. These fields are not independent confirmation of current authorisation. Check the exact contracting entity and registration number on the official Municipal District Office of Vienna (Magistratisches Bezirksamt), FMA, BaFin public register.
Which of Bitpanda Wallet's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
No matching licence records were found in this site's cross-border payment institutions, msbs, remittance corridors, insurance and fiduciary trusts source selection. The dataset may be incomplete; check the relevant official registers before drawing conclusions about authorisation or jurisdiction.
What is Bitpanda Wallet's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
Bitpanda Wallet carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset, alongside composite 5-dimension ratings out of 10 (overall: 2.5, risk & licensing: 2.2, brand: 3.0, market influence: 2.6, user reputation: 0.0). The imported source lists 0 exposure entries. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to Bitpanda Wallet's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with Bitpanda Wallet, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (bitpanda.com) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 source exposure entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to Municipal District Office of Vienna (Magistratisches Bezirksamt).