1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Magic Compass vs Nedbank Group: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Magic Compass (Magic Compass Ltd) and Nedbank Group (Nedbank Group) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Cross-border payment institutions, MSBs, remittance corridors, insurance and fiduciary trusts
- Magic Compass 6D Score
- 6.7
- Nedbank Group 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 2
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Magic Compass outranks Nedbank Group by +1.7 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.7 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, Magic Compass holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Nedbank Group holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Magic Compass | Nedbank Group | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 6.7 | 5.0 | +1.7 | Magic Compass |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 4.2 | 5.0 | +0.8 | Nedbank Group |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 4.0 | 3.0 | +1.0 | Magic Compass |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 6.8 | 5.0 | +1.8 | Magic Compass |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Magic Compass vs Nedbank Group
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Magic Compass | Nedbank Group |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Magic Compass Ltd | Nedbank Group |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA): #204684South African Reserve Bank (SARB / Prudential Authority): Not supplied | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | :Sarlo 9, Ayios Athanasios, 4106 Limassol, Cyprus | 135 Rivonia Road, Sandown, Sandton, 2196, South Africa |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Forex, metals, spot index, vitality | Wealth management, Investment products, Deposits, Remittances, Loans, Trusts, Insurance |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Nedbank Money |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Magic Compass and Nedbank Group against other regulated peers in our cross-border payment institutions, msbs, remittance corridors, insurance and fiduciary trusts slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Magic Compass vs Nedbank Group
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Magic Compass or Nedbank Group?
Nedbank Group holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 1). Specifically, Magic Compass maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Nedbank Group maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA), South African Reserve Bank (SARB / Prudential Authority)) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Magic Compass and Nedbank Group?
In PayClear Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Magic Compass records an Overall Score of 6.7 (Risk & Licensing: 4.2, Brand: 6.8, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with Nedbank Group at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do Magic Compass and Nedbank Group differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Magic Compass lists Forex, metals, spot index, vitality with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Nedbank Group lists Wealth management, Investment products, Deposits, Remittances, Loans, Trusts, Insurance with execution software [Nedbank Money]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Magic Compass or Nedbank Group?
Magic Compass carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Nedbank Group carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.