1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
GS vs ING BANK: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of GS (The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.) and ING BANK (ING Group) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Cross-border payment institutions, MSBs, remittance corridors, insurance and fiduciary trusts
- GS 6D Score
- 5.0
- ING BANK 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 2 vs 3
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
GS and ING BANK are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, GS holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas ING BANK holds 3 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | GS | ING BANK | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: GS vs ING BANK
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | GS | ING BANK |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | ING Group |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) | 3 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | European Central Bank (ECB Banking Supervision / SSM): Not suppliedDe Nederlandsche Bank (DNB): #B0163Prudential Regulation Authority (Bank of England PRA): Not supplied | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | United States New York State New York City Manhattan West Street 200 | the Netherlands Amsterdam |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | commercial banking, asset management, investment banking, investment management, financial services | Financial products, insurance, investments, mortgages |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare GS and ING BANK against other regulated peers in our cross-border payment institutions, msbs, remittance corridors, insurance and fiduciary trusts slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: GS vs ING BANK
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: GS or ING BANK?
ING BANK holds more active regulated filings (3 vs 2). Specifically, GS maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S. Fed), Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (U.S. OCC)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas ING BANK maintains 3 recorded filing(s) (European Central Bank (ECB Banking Supervision / SSM), De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB), Prudential Regulation Authority (Bank of England PRA)) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between GS and ING BANK?
In PayClear Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), GS records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with ING BANK at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do GS and ING BANK differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
GS lists commercial banking, asset management, investment banking, investment management, financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while ING BANK lists Financial products, insurance, investments, mortgages with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: GS or ING BANK?
GS carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while ING BANK carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.