Skip to content
PayClear Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

Deriv vs FMBM: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Deriv (Deriv (FX) Ltd) and FMBM (F&M Bank Corp.) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Cross-border payment institutions, MSBs, remittance corridors, insurance and fiduciary trusts

Deriv 6D Score
5.3
FMBM 6D Score
4.0
Regulated Licences
5 vs 4
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: deriv-vs-fmbm

Deriv outranks FMBM by +1.3 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.3 vs 4.0)

On supervisory breadth, Deriv holds 5 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 5 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas FMBM holds 4 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 4 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightDerivFMBMScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.34.0+1.3Deriv
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight5.04.0+1.0Deriv
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.02.0+1.0Deriv
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight6.04.0+2.0Deriv
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight4.04.00.0Statistical Tie

Visual Architecture Benchmark: Deriv vs FMBM

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: Deriv vs FMBM
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between Deriv and FMBM.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeDerivFMBM
Primary Legal NameDeriv (FX) LtdF&M Bank Corp.
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings5 regulated / 5 total (0 Tier-1)4 regulated / 4 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressLevel 3, W Business Centre, Triq Dun Karm, Birkirkara, BKR 9033 Office 1902, Jumeirah Business Center 1, JLT Cluster G Suite 1, Ground Floor, Block D Apex Forbury Road Reading RG1 1AXCorporate Office: P.O. Box 1111, Timberville, VA 22853, USA
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesForeign exchange, composite index, stock index, commoditiesMulti-asset financial services
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformF&M Bank, VA
Supported Client LanguagesOther languages, Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Portuguese, Bengali, Vietnamese, Polish, English, KoreanEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare Deriv and FMBM against other regulated peers in our cross-border payment institutions, msbs, remittance corridors, insurance and fiduciary trusts slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: Deriv vs FMBM

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Deriv or FMBM?

Deriv holds more active regulated filings (5 vs 4). Specifically, Deriv maintains 5 total recorded filing(s) (VFSC, BVIFSC, MFSA, Financial Services Commission, Mauritius) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas FMBM maintains 4 recorded filing(s) (U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), , Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S. Fed), Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (U.S. FDIC)) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Deriv and FMBM?

In PayClear Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Deriv records an Overall Score of 5.3 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with FMBM at 4.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).

How do Deriv and FMBM differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

Deriv lists Foreign exchange, composite index, stock index, commodities with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while FMBM lists general financial services with execution software [F&M Bank, VA]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Deriv or FMBM?

Deriv carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while FMBM carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

Deriv vs FMBM (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | PayClear Ledger