1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
DeDust vs UBP SA: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of DeDust (DeDust) and UBP SA (Union Bancaire Privée) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Cross-border payment institutions, MSBs, remittance corridors, insurance and fiduciary trusts
- DeDust 6D Score
- 2.0
- UBP SA 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
UBP SA outranks DeDust by +3.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, DeDust holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas UBP SA holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | DeDust | UBP SA | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.0 | 5.0 | +3.0 | UBP SA |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 5.0 | +3.0 | UBP SA |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 | UBP SA |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 5.0 | +3.0 | UBP SA |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 5.0 | +3.0 | UBP SA |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: DeDust vs UBP SA
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | DeDust | UBP SA |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | DeDust | Union Bancaire Privée |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | FINMA: Not supplied |
| Registered Domicile / Address | CH | 96-98, rue du Rhône PO Box 1320 CH-1211 Geneva Switzerland |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Trading | Wealth management, Investment products, Deposits, Remittances, Loans, Trusts, Insurance |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare DeDust and UBP SA against other regulated peers in our cross-border payment institutions, msbs, remittance corridors, insurance and fiduciary trusts slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: DeDust vs UBP SA
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: DeDust or UBP SA?
UBP SA holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, DeDust maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas UBP SA maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (FINMA) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between DeDust and UBP SA?
In PayClear Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), DeDust records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with UBP SA at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do DeDust and UBP SA differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
DeDust lists Trading with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while UBP SA lists Wealth management, Investment products, Deposits, Remittances, Loans, Trusts, Insurance with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: DeDust or UBP SA?
DeDust carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while UBP SA carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.