Skip to content
PayClear Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

APME FX vs CDB: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of APME FX (APME FX TRADING EUROPE Ltd) and CDB (Cyprus Development Bank) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Cross-border payment institutions, MSBs, remittance corridors, insurance and fiduciary trusts

APME FX 6D Score
6.0
CDB 6D Score
5.0
Regulated Licences
2 vs 0
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: apme-fx-vs-cdb

APME FX outranks CDB by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, APME FX holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas CDB holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightAPME FXCDBScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite6.05.0+1.0APME FX
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight6.05.0+1.0APME FX
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.03.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight6.05.0+1.0APME FX
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight6.05.0+1.0APME FX

Visual Architecture Benchmark: APME FX vs CDB

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: APME FX vs CDB
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between APME FX and CDB.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeAPME FXCDB
Primary Legal NameAPME FX TRADING EUROPE LtdCyprus Development Bank
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
CONSOB: Not suppliedCYSEC: #335/17
None on file
Registered Domicile / AddressSpyrou Kyprianou 25,Floor 1/Office 103, 3070 , Limassol, CyprusNicosia, Cyprus
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesOptions, futures, swaps, forwardsWealth management, Investment products, Deposits, Remittances, Loans, Trusts, Insurance
Execution Software & TerminalsMT5Proprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare APME FX and CDB against other regulated peers in our cross-border payment institutions, msbs, remittance corridors, insurance and fiduciary trusts slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: APME FX vs CDB

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: APME FX or CDB?

APME FX holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 0). Specifically, APME FX maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (CONSOB, CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas CDB maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between APME FX and CDB?

In PayClear Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), APME FX records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with CDB at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do APME FX and CDB differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

APME FX lists Options, futures, swaps, forwards with execution software [MT5], while CDB lists Wealth management, Investment products, Deposits, Remittances, Loans, Trusts, Insurance with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: APME FX or CDB?

APME FX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while CDB carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

APME FX vs CDB (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | PayClear Ledger